Concepts and their limits
Recovered refrigerant may be returned to equipment under the same ownership; transfer to another owner requires reclamation by an EPA-certified reclaimer. Recovery removes refrigerant and stores it; recycling reduces contaminants for reuse; reclamation processes it to a specified purity standard with certified-reclaimer requirements. The venting prohibition covers knowing releases during maintenance, service, repair or disposal; narrow exceptions do not authorize routine release. Restricted refrigerant sales require purchaser certification or documented employment of an appropriately certified technician, subject to defined exceptions.
Worked decisions
Recovered refrigerant from one supermarket rack is proposed for another rack owned by the same company. Which ownership fact supports reuse without mandatory ownership-transfer reclamation? The decision is Both appliances have the same owner. Recovered refrigerant may be returned to equipment under the same ownership; transfer to another owner requires reclamation by an EPA-certified reclaimer. A technician removes refrigerant from an appliance and stores it in an external container without testing purity. Which process has definitely occurred? The decision is Recovery. Recovery removes refrigerant and stores it; recycling reduces contaminants for reuse; reclamation processes it to a specified purity standard with certified-reclaimer requirements. A worker proposes opening a refrigerant line and intentionally releasing its charge to save time. Which response fits the venting rule? The decision is Recover the refrigerant using applicable procedures. The venting prohibition covers knowing releases during maintenance, service, repair or disposal; narrow exceptions do not authorize routine release. A business buys restricted refrigerant for stationary service and employs a certified technician. What should the seller document? The decision is That the buyer employs an appropriately certified technician. Restricted refrigerant sales require purchaser certification or documented employment of an appropriately certified technician, subject to defined exceptions.
Contrasts that change the decision
A service company proposes selling a customer's used refrigerant directly to an unrelated appliance owner. What is required before that transfer for reuse? Here the supported answer is Reclamation by an EPA-certified reclaimer. Recovered refrigerant may be returned to equipment under the same ownership; transfer to another owner requires reclamation by an EPA-certified reclaimer. A processor brings used refrigerant to the required purity standard under the EPA reclaimer program. Which term fits? Here the supported answer is Reclamation. Recovery removes refrigerant and stores it; recycling reduces contaminants for reuse; reclamation processes it to a specified purity standard with certified-reclaimer requirements. A supervisor says any release is allowed if called de minimis. What is the best correction? Here the supported answer is Only narrowly qualifying releases associated with good-faith recovery are excepted. The venting prohibition covers knowing releases during maintenance, service, repair or disposal; narrow exceptions do not authorize routine release. An uncertified person asks a technician to lend a certification card for a personal refrigerant purchase. Which response fits the restriction? Here the supported answer is Do not use the card to bypass the purchaser requirements. Restricted refrigerant sales require purchaser certification or documented employment of an appropriately certified technician, subject to defined exceptions.
Transfer and self-check
Customer A’srefrigerant is field-recycled and proposed forCustomer B’sappliance. Which fact changes the mandatory reclamation analysis? The ownerchanges; field recycling alone does not establish the certified-reclamation pathway needed for that transfer.
Recovered refrigerant from one supermarket rack is proposed for another rack owned by the same company. Which ownership fact supports reuse without mandatory ownership-transfer reclamation?
- The relevant stated condition is: Recovered refrigerant from one supermarket rack is proposed for another rack owned by the same company.
- Apply the relevant source rule. Recovered refrigerant may be returned to equipment under the same ownership; transfer to another owner requires reclamation by an EPA-certified reclaimer.
- This supports “Both appliances have the same owner”. The alternative “Both appliances use the same refrigerant type” uses a different condition or conclusion;the applicable rule above explains why it does not answer this case.
Compare the other answer choices
This choice (Both appliances use the same refrigerant type) does not fit the stated conditions. Recovered refrigerant may be returned to equipment under the same ownership; transfer to another owner requires reclamation by an EPA-certified reclaimer.
This choice (The same service company maintains both appliances) does not fit the stated conditions. Recovered refrigerant may be returned to equipment under the same ownership; transfer to another owner requires reclamation by an EPA-certified reclaimer.
This choice (Both appliances have the same pressure category) does not fit the stated conditions. Recovered refrigerant may be returned to equipment under the same ownership; transfer to another owner requires reclamation by an EPA-certified reclaimer.
Try it, then explain it.
Complete a short set without looking at the example. After each answer, explain which evidence or rule supports your decision and why the alternatives do not fit.
Sources & authorship
Original Slope explanations and examples. References support the concepts; they are not the source of copied questions. Independent educator review is pending.
Epa ReclaimEpa SalesEpa Venting