Concepts and their limits
For the limited non-major low-pressure repair exception not followed by evacuation to the environment, pressurize to 0 psig before opening; prohibited subsequent-purge methods are not generally allowed. Leak inspection must locate leaks; methods that only indicate overall pressure loss do not by themselves locate a leak. Verification checks repaired sites. A required follow-up verification generally occurs within 30 days after return to normal operating characteristics, with the source's professional-judgment exception. For applicable leak-repair timelines, qualifying mothballing temporarily suspends timelines; the clock resumes when the appliance returns online.
Worked decisions
A low-pressure appliance qualifies for the limited non-major repair exception. What pressure condition is stated before opening? The decision is Pressurize it to 0 psig. For the limited non-major low-pressure repair exception not followed by evacuation to the environment, pressurize to 0 psig before opening; prohibited subsequent-purge methods are not generally allowed. A chiller investigation uses a bubble test at accessible joints to locate leakage. Which objective does this directly address? The decision is Locating a leak. Leak inspection must locate leaks; methods that only indicate overall pressure loss do not by themselves locate a leak. Verification checks repaired sites. An applicable ODS chiller repair returns to normal operating characteristics on October 1. A required follow-up is performed on October 20. How far after return is that? The decision is 19 days. Within the same October, the elapsed time from October 1 to October 20 is 20−1=19 days. That falls within the general 30-day follow-up window after return to normal operating characteristics. An applicable ODS chiller is properly mothballed as defined by EPA. What happens to relevant leak-repair timelines? The decision is They are suspended during qualifying mothballing. For applicable leak-repair timelines, qualifying mothballing temporarily suspends timelines; the clock resumes when the appliance returns online.
Contrasts that change the decision
A low-pressure repair is major. Can the non-major-repair exception be used solely because the appliance is low pressure? Here the supported answer is No; the repair-scope prerequisite is missing. For the limited non-major low-pressure repair exception not followed by evacuation to the environment, pressurize to 0 psig before opening; prohibited subsequent-purge methods are not generally allowed. A vacuum-decay observation indicates leakage but identifies no location. What additional objective remains? Here the supported answer is Locate the leak using an appropriate locating method. Leak inspection must locate leaks; methods that only indicate overall pressure loss do not by themselves locate a leak. Verification checks repaired sites. An applicable chiller repair has only an initial test before recharge. What must be considered separately? Here the supported answer is The required follow-up verification under normal operating characteristics. A required follow-up verification generally occurs within 30 days after return to normal operating characteristics, with the source's professional-judgment exception. A properly mothballed appliance is brought back online. What happens to the suspended timelines? Here the supported answer is They resume. For applicable leak-repair timelines, qualifying mothballing temporarily suspends timelines; the clock resumes when the appliance returns online.
Transfer and self-check
A repair has an initial verification before recharge. Is that always the last verification needed? No. A required follow-up considers the specified normal-operating-condition context, and the initial test alone does not establish that later condition.
A low-pressure appliance qualifies for the limited non-major repair exception. What pressure condition is stated before opening?
- The relevant stated condition is: A low-pressure appliance qualifies for the limited non-major repair exception.
- Apply the relevant source rule. For the limited non-major low-pressure repair exception not followed by evacuation to the environment, pressurize to 0 psig before opening; prohibited subsequent-purge methods are not generally allowed.
- This supports “Pressurize it to 0 psig”. The alternative “Leave it at a deep operating vacuum” uses a different condition or conclusion;the applicable rule above explains why it does not answer this case.
Compare the other answer choices
This choice (Leave it at a deep operating vacuum) does not fit the stated conditions. For the limited non-major low-pressure repair exception not followed by evacuation to the environment, pressurize to 0 psig before opening; prohibited subsequent-purge methods are not generally allowed.
This choice (Raise it to normal high-pressure operation) does not fit the stated conditions. For the limited non-major low-pressure repair exception not followed by evacuation to the environment, pressurize to 0 psig before opening; prohibited subsequent-purge methods are not generally allowed.
This choice (Use any positive pressure without limit) does not fit the stated conditions. For the limited non-major low-pressure repair exception not followed by evacuation to the environment, pressurize to 0 psig before opening; prohibited subsequent-purge methods are not generally allowed.
Try it, then explain it.
Complete a short set without looking at the example. After each answer, explain which evidence or rule supports your decision and why the alternatives do not fit.
Sources & authorship
Original Slope explanations and examples. References support the concepts; they are not the source of copied questions. Independent educator review is pending.
Epa LeaksEpa PracticesEpa Qa